ten thousand kinds of suck fucking wrong ([info]hector_rashbaum) wrote,
@ 2007-09-29 20:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:bitching, brainz om nom nom nom, otw

Organization for Transformative Wank
I was hesitant about the Archive of Our Own stuff from the beginning. Aside from the fact that I really don't see a need for another archive for myself to use - I have RockFic, and [info]hectorfic, and those are plenty good enough for me - it seemed right from the get-go like a bloated, overambitious, doomed-to-fail vanity project.

My opinion mellowed a bit over time. Yes, it was still bloated, and the ambition wasn't quite in line with the abilities of those interested, and I still doubt it'll get where it's supposed to go. But I was less "oh God this is gonna suck"and more "okay this should be interesting to watch".

For a long time, the [info]otw_news comm was silent. Or, mostly silent: From June 14th to August 4th inclusive, there were 3 updates, one of which was simply to say there was no news.

September 21, activity. A post to inform the name had been changed (more on that in a second), there was a Community Relations committee, and more news was coming.

The name was changed to the Organization for Transformative Works (OTW), the community to [info]otw_news. The name didn't sit right with me, but I wasn't sure why - it seemed pompous and overblown, but there was more. I'll get back to it.

As promised, more news came September 28th. Lots of news! Boards had been formed, projects were in the works, domain name had been purchased and a placeholder page put up.

To be honest, up until now I haven't followed OTW all that closely. They're on my friends list, on the "Daily Read" filter, but generally I'd read the update and ten or so "yay so cool!" comments and forget about it.

But [info]partly_bouncy pointed something interesting out in her LJ - one of the proposed eventual projects was a fan history wiki.

Um. Whut.

She posted to point out a fan history wiki already exists. As did I.

The initial answer to my "why?" was "bringing another voice into the preservation of fannish history". To which I responded that as a wiki, it is by nature not just one voice, and any voice that wants to can participate. I recieved, in essende, corporate bullshit as an answer to that.

I won't go through the whole thread; you should read it. The other important point from there is the original poster, [info]femmequixotic stepped in and asked that I e-mail her to discuss outreach beyond LJ.

Before I get into my discussion with [info]femmequixotic and what that brought to light, I want to call attention to a couple other threads:

[info]anextropian asks about the lack of outreach

Anonymous points out there were derogatory statements made about non-LJ fen by OTW supporters

Those were all posted before I contacted [info]femmequixotic. I'll spare you the long-winded e-mail, but in essence I told her:
- I don't know much about fandom outside RockFic (RF) and a bit of LJ so I'm not much help in the outreach department
- [info]partly_bouncy knows her shit, and the FanHistory.com list of archives is an excellent resource
- [info]screwthedaisies TRIED to get in touch with OTW quite a while ago and was ignored
- My main suggestion is to get to outreach NOW and be willing to retool some of the boards to reflect more than just LJ fandom

In her e-mail back to me - in which she once again admitted and apologized for the failure to look off LJ for interest before now - she essentially said my suggestions were good, she'd try to get in touch with [info]screwthedaisies and [info]partly_bouncy, and that she didn't know anything about RockFic or FanworksFinder (FwF), so could I tell her something about them?

That should have been a big red flag right there, and I'll explain why in a moment. But it didn't ping me, so I explained about RockFic (for those who don't know: RockFic.com's a bandfic archive, paid membership [48-hour free trial], 18+, quality controlled, aimed more at classic rock/metal/hard rock than "emo"/FBR bands), pimped FwF (which y'all should be using ;] ), all good. Another e-mail from her, expressing her surprise at having never come across either, being a bandslasher.

Again, should've red-flagged me. But I didn't think anything of it, I'd found a different issue.

Remember me saying the Organization for Transformative Works name bothered me? [info]partly_bouncy touched on why in IM - RPF? Isn't transformative. I suppose a case could be made that it is, in fact, transformative, but it'd take a lot to persuade me. And fact aside, historically "transformative" hasn't applied to RPF.

I brought that up here and got told [info]femmequixotic would get me a more concrete answer from someone involved in the renaming. Fair 'nuff.

(ETA: [info]femmequixotic has answered the name question, with much the same answer as the first time - they consider RPF transformative. Fair enough - although I'm still curious as to how they'll address the historical issue of RPF not being "transformative" when reaching out to RPF communities.

ETA again: Further downthread, she points out the archive is still "An Archive of Our Own", which...does make more sense than referring to the archive as an organization. Heh.)

And, because I never run out of questions, I also asked when the community could expect, if not a rough TOU/TOS, at the very least a list of what content will be acceptable and unacceptable, and what content hasn't been decided on yet. No answer yet.

Alright. So. Why should the fact that [info]femmequixotic hadn't ever heard of RockFic bother me?

In [info]partlybouncy's LJ, we've been discussing OTW. And we brought up [info]femmequixotic as a bandslasher, and [info]sidewinder pointed out (in an flocked post in [info]partly_bouncy's LJ) she sounded more like a media fan that had come into bandfic through the MCR/Panic!/FOB fandom. Nothing wrong with that, and it may explain the lack of RF knowledge - RF doesn't really cater to that fandom so much.

But. As I was typing up that in response to [info]sidewinder, something occurred to me (that was also pointed out in that flocked post) - anyone who works for OTW should have at least some knowledge of RockFic.

It's on the list of archives to be looked into. In fact, [info]sidewinder even commented about RF's 48-hour free trial for anyone who wanted to take a look.

([info]sidewinder, if you've got links to any other times you mentioned RF on/to OTW, I'll add 'em in)

(ETA: [info]sidewinder has commented to this entry with a summary of her own mentions of RockFic throughout the OTW discussions)

So, folks, the members of OTW's board are, apparently, ignoring user input. By her own admittance [info]femmequixotic should have an interest in RockFic even outside of the OTW work, and she apparently had no idea it existed! Even though it'd been mentioned by users and included in an offical OTW post.

I'd like the issue with the name addressed satisfactorily. I'd like that list of allowable content. I'd like to see concrete outreach happening. And I'd kind of like to know what all the research and discussion from months ago were for, if not to be actually used and applied.

I don't, at present, actively support OTW; nor would I consider myself a detractor. I see lots of questions that need raising - and I think I'll continue to raise them until I decide one way or the other. So we'll see.

ETA: One more issue I'd like to bring up:

Questions have been raised, here and here, about finances - specifically concerning the rename token, but with the underlying questions of "why don't we know anything about this project's finances?"

A satisfactory response hasn't really come yet. And that's one of my big concerns with this multitude of committees - a simple question (who paid?) with an important undertone (what's going on with this organization's finances?) can't get a straight answer, just "I'll have finance look into it" followed by "financial reports are coming eventually". I would imagine that, considering one of the big issues with LJ is its refusal to clearly communicate its expectations and restrictions, clear communication would be important to OTW staff.

Son of ETA: I'd also like to state this is in no way meant to be an attack on [info]femmequixotic, simply an expression of concern that the chairperson of Community Relations appears to have completely missed some discussion, and a question of how much else is slipping by unnoticed, and why, exactly, are we contributing only to be ignored?




(109 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sidewinder
2007-09-30 02:41 am UTC (link)
Bravo for the excellent summary.

Here is where discussion for "An Archive of One's Own" first began, in [info]astolat's journal on May 17. I'm right here on page 3 of the comments 1st mentioning RockFic (in the context of its subscription model).

I'm back here again in further comments directly linking to RockFic on the membership issue, keeping fic off google, etc.

Again here, mentioning how rockfic handles crossover fandoms.

There are probably more examples in some other open discussions before the official community launched; I'll just need to do a little more digging.

But, yeah. This is why the proclaimed ignorance of the archive by the "outreach" person really sticks in my throat a bit.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 04:08 am UTC (link)
I knew I remembered the crossover mention.

Referenced this comment in the post :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-09-30 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-09-30 01:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-09-30 02:06 pm UTC

[info]evaine
2007-09-30 04:04 am UTC (link)
Ah yes, and these are the people that believe that fandom in general can work together.

Excuse my total skepticism, but I've seen it tried and tried again - in media fandom, literary fandom, sports fandom, whatever fandom. It never seems to work. Even in the Trek fandoms, the Next Genners can't deal with the Originals who don't respect the Voyagerites... *shaking head* I think it's the nature of the beast.

When the word 'fen' comes up in conversation, I get wary. It never seems to bode well.

More power to you folks for trying to stick with it. I'm pulling for you; you've got a hard row to hoe.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 04:07 am UTC (link)
More power to you folks for trying to stick with it. I'm pulling for you; you've got a hard row to hoe.

Mm, yeah.

At the moment I'm really just watching and discussing to form an actual opinion: my initial doomed-to-fail was very knee-jerk, and right now I think it's very up in the air whether they can pull this off or fail.

I think the biggest issue is a very disproportionate number of people are going "yay! this is so awesome!" and what really dooms a project this scale is when problems aren't raised in the early stages.

So we shall see.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]executrix, 2007-09-30 10:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:54 pm UTC

[info]sidewinder
2007-09-30 01:56 pm UTC (link)
This is why organizing anything large scale in fandom is like attempting to herd cats. Quite honestly I think we're all better off sticking--to an extent at least--in our territories than trying to come up with some solution or "neutral ground" that can try to serve everyone. Already some issues have come up that I don't see how there is any way to please everyone: "I won't post to an archive that would include RPF/chan/incest/etc."; "I won't post to an archive that wouldn't include RPF/chan/incest/etc."

This is why I think Fanworksfinder is such a brilliant tool in comparison--everyone hosts what they want where they want, just provide a network and method for other fans to actually find it. And even there, there's going to be abuse to an extent of people "burying" links to content they dislike without even reading it, but dealing with those issues seems a lot simpler than trying to come up with a brand new archive to somehow try to make everyone happy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]screwthedaisies
2007-09-30 04:46 am UTC (link)
Excellent summation! ~makes more popcorn~

(Reply to this)


[info]kayjayuu
2007-09-30 07:19 am UTC (link)
Here from [info]fanthropology.

A new non-profit probably has very little financing, and anything out of pocket may have been paid by board members or benefactors or pooling money. Rename token, website space, legal docs for the nonprofit, consulting a lawyer... that's probably about it. What's the specific concern?

I have no opinion on OTW one way or another, although I'm interested to see how it pans out and have volunteered whatever I think I can do if it begins to work down the road. The Fan Wiki thing did bother me a LOT, since I'm LJ/AIM-friends with [info]partly_bouncy.

It's not an easy road they've chosen, and to actually have full committees this early on is really a big step. Whether they 'work well with others' remains to be seen.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 12:23 pm UTC (link)
What's the specific concern?

For me, it isn't so much about the money - I don't particularly care what they do with money until people start donating, and even then since I doubt I'll ever be totally on board with this and donate, it'd be in a more "this is another reason I'm not behind this project" sense - than me finding it worrying that the second request for the information was met with "Let me ask the committee...okay the committee says you'll know eventually."

Which, yes, did actually answer the "Will finances be made public?" question, and the initial "Who paid?" question was also answered - I think it's more something to keep an eye on, that the people whose job it is to answer questions aren't given enough information to answer them, and the people with the information don't appear to be following the conversations.

And to be fair, I don't think questions about finances were expected at this point in the game - a better example would be that my question about the name change remains unanswered. It was an announcement that came out of the blue, and thinking about it this morning I realized they went ahead with a domain name that never appeared on the domain name poll (some were close, and the community was told the ultimate domain name would come from the top ten suggestions as discussed with a laywer by [info]astolat) without any explanation, simply "this is it".

They had to have expected at least some questions about the name change - while mine was one that may not have been anticipated, particularly if no one on the board thought of the RPF issue - in which case they should have prepared their question-answerers for those questions.

At the moment? It isn't really a big issue. But when they get more and more volunteers, and more underway with the project, if it still looks like the committees don't talk about their decisions with each other it might turn into a big thing.

It's not an easy road they've chosen, and to actually have full committees this early on is really a big step. Whether they 'work well with others' remains to be seen.

It is, definitely. And my only concern with that is they formed the complete leadership before they started looking off LJ for interest/volunteers. That was, apparently, an oversight, and has been apologized for, but I'm not sure a project that aims to represent everyone makes a very good start by ignoring everyone else's playgrounds.

Most of these, really, are "wait and see" issues - I know it's too early to tell if their communication glitches will get better, or if the lack of outreach will be sorted out and it'll be smooth multi-playground sailing from here on out.

But the biggest trap this project could fall into is, with the vast majority of supporters taking every new announcement with little more than a "yay! awesome! go you!", missing something that, if noticed at the beginning, would've been easy to fix, but only gets noticed when it's too big a problem to manage.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]serrana, 2007-09-30 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 09:40 pm UTC

[info]evaine
2007-09-30 04:39 pm UTC (link)
Just a little morning thought, and maybe it sounds flip, but in my opinion, the name totally sucks. I never saw the poll or any other suggestions, mind you. I just think the "Organization for Transformative Works" sounds ridiculously pretentious and snotty. As a fan of a multitude of things, media and literary and real people, it comes across as Harry Potter-inspired instead of being an all-inclusive name. I mean, let's be honest here, how many people in ANY fandom are going to grasp the meaning of "transformative works"? For my taste, it's not inviting at all. It sure doesn't instantly say 'all kinds of fanfic here' to me.

Just sayin'.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 04:43 pm UTC (link)
The poll was about domain names, and the one they're using now wasn't on the poll. There were a few close options...transformativefiction.org and fanworks.com, if I remember correctly.

And it does sound pretentious! It's not at all "warm, inviting fan community".

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 09:46 pm UTC

[info]elfwreck
2007-10-01 09:39 pm UTC (link)
I have mixed thoughts about the name. It sounds too stuffy, too formal. OTOH, it mentions "transformative" instead of "fanfiction"--nicely cutting right to the point of why we think fanfic is not copyright infringement. I'm not sure any fan archive has made direct statements that "we believe fanfiction is transformative, not derivative, and therefore covered by fair use." (Not sure this one would, either... but having the OTW name establishes the idea without having to say so directly.)

OTW is a name that can be thrown around in academia. A name that people can put on their resumes... "I was on the editing committee of the Organization for Transformative Works" or even "My writings are archived at the Organization for Transformative Works."

It's a slick bit of mainstream marketing. It says very clearly, "this is not a shameful back-room hobby."

I have mixed opinions about that, too. I'd be more worried if I didn't know what [info]femmequixotic and [info]bethbethbeth liked in their fanfic--it sounds like a name to exclude the extreme, weird or kinky stuff. I know it won't be, but there may not be a way to make that apparent to others.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evaine, 2007-10-01 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfwreck, 2007-10-02 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evaine, 2007-10-02 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfwreck, 2007-10-02 04:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashpine, 2007-10-02 08:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfwreck, 2007-10-02 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashpine, 2007-10-03 12:24 am UTC
Correction
[info]anextropian
2007-10-07 04:13 am UTC (link)
Correction, the poll was about domain names, not organizational name. There was never a poll on the name for the organization. It was decided by the "otw" bureaucracy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lovelokest
2007-09-30 09:36 pm UTC (link)
This is a very interesting post and has given me food for thought. The beautiful thing about the planned archive is that it isn't owned by one person, it is owned by all of us, which is so frigging cool! I want to make one comment re fandomhistory, the information provided there is often incomplete and inaccurate. For example, in the due South section, there is no mention of the due Slash archive or the due South fiction archive--the two largest archives in the fandom. Also, the story count does not accurately reflect how many stories there actually are in the fandom; on DSA, there are 4,599 listed, the total story count listed at fanhistory is 434. The history is also owned by only one person, and credibility wise, with only one owner I don't trust the information as much.

The other purpose of the archive is a way to legitimise what we do, take control of our beautiful fannish history before that control is taken away by someone else. It is ours and we should be proud of it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 09:45 pm UTC (link)
This is a very interesting post and has given me food for thought.

Excellent! That's what I'm aiming for - I'm not trying for "bitch bitch bitch" but "x worries me and maybe we should think about y and why is no one talking about z?"

I want to make one comment re fandomhistory, the information provided there is often incomplete and inaccurate.The history is also owned by only one person, and credibility wise, with only one owner I don't trust the information as much.

That's a personal preference thing, really - I get where you're coming from, I've just never had that issue re: trust so it's hard for me to specifically address it. I do get your concern, though.

The other purpose of the archive is a way to legitimise what we do, take control of our beautiful fannish history before that control is taken away by someone else. It is ours and we should be proud of it.

And if that's what it becomes? Awesome. I'd really love to see that happen - I'm just raising some concerns I have about the way they're getting there. And it's so early that it's hard to judge big problems - which makes now a good time for discussions like this: cast a critical eye on the speed bumps before they're brick walls, y'know?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]antennapedia
2007-09-30 09:58 pm UTC (link)
The awesome thing about wikis is that you can edit them if you discover incomplete or inaccurate information. If the Due South section is out of date, you can fix it. Just click one of the "edit" links.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-01 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-01 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spare_change, 2007-09-30 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spare_change, 2007-09-30 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-01 12:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 09:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spare_change, 2007-10-01 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spare_change, 2007-10-01 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 10:29 pm UTC
you're making it too easy! - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-01 10:55 pm UTC
Re: you're making it too easy! - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 11:05 pm UTC
Re: you're making it too easy! - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-01 11:08 pm UTC
Re: you're making it too easy! - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 11:12 pm UTC
Re: you're making it too easy! - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-10-01 11:31 pm UTC

[info]norah
2007-09-30 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Disclaimer: I'm not on any of the fanarchive boards or committees. I'm excited about the project and I plan to volunteer for it when the time comes, but I'm not part of the planning process. That said -

You know, frankly, this organization JUST GOT STARTED. They're not even IN the research and outreach phase yet, AFAIK. There IS no archive yet. There is, as far as I know, no money yet, unless board members have chipped in personal funds, so it's hard to have financial reports. The massive amounts of negativity I'm seeing from some people about the failure to reach out are just frustrating in the face of the fact that NOTHING HAS HAPPENED YET. Okay, they chose a name, and put together boards of volunteers, but frankly, startup is not the moment to go broadly democratic if you ever want to get anything off the ground - a business, an archive - maybe a political campaign, but even those tend to start with a candidate, their team, and some key donors. Why the instant anger? Why not give them a chance, once they get going, to actually *do* some outreach?

On another topic, sort of tangential:
By her own admittance femmequixotic should have an interest in RockFic even outside of the OTW work, and she apparently had no idea it existed!

The bands archived on Rockfic did not, when I got a 48-hour pass to look at it a few months ago, include any of the FBR 6-degrees bands that "bandslash" as LJ understands it revolves around, nor did they include any of the "popslash" groups as far as I remember. Different parts of music fic fandom are centered in different places on the internet - there's no reason a FBR slasher should know about RockFic, any more than RockFic folks should be subscribed to the bandom newsletters on LJ. Which is not to say you wouldn't be willing to archive those bands, but those fandoms have evolved in separate places online, and there's really no reason for them to overlap, IMHO. I read popslash occasionally and am heavily involved in bandslash, as well as reading actorfic and a wide variety of other RPF, and I'm not (I don't say this to be insulting, I'm just trying to say that the interest areas don't necessarily overlap) particularly interested in Rockfic myself; I seem to recall that I listen to very few of the bands that had fic listed for them there (and am uninterested in reading fiction about any of those), and hadn't been aware of Rockfic at all until someone mentioned it on an off-LJ blog and I went to check it out.

Now, asking that the folks designing the fanarchive be aware of other archives, THAT I can get behind, but let me repeat, they JUST GOT STARTED. Nobody has started to start to think about beginning to ponder what this archive might look like, beyond the original "hey, you know what would be neat?" post that started it all. I am pretty sure that there WILL be outreach and a search for wider input when they get to those stages, but if everybody pisses in their Cheerios first it's going to be a lot harder to have productive dialogue.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]miriam_heddy
2007-09-30 10:22 pm UTC (link)
I've been reading this whole thing, and I actually know the OTW board members and other volunteers better than I do [info]partly_bouncy, but...

I do want to step in here and respond to your comment about pissing in OTW's Cheerios. I worry (greatly) whenever the process of asking questions is conflated with Cheerio-pissing. Cheerio-pissing is something we may attack if it's a response to a "squee" post. But when people are responding to something like OTW's announcement, I think that the term "Cheerio-pissing" doesn't even make sense. If OTW can't survive a little squee-harshing divergence from the "Yeah! You guys are so cool!" type-response, I do think OTW will fail to do more than become a vanity project for the small, fairly insular segment of fandom already involved and on the masthead.

As for your comment that, "they JUST GOT STARTED," I'll just point again to Hector's timeline and the long silence that preceded the Sept 28th announcement. In the Sept 28 post, OTW appears highly organized, so much so that the next few emails have been calls for volunteers that look a lot like corporate job applications, including one that describes the position as "closely supervised by the Chair."

Given that the two job posts that've come through today seem to require a resume of sorts and a commitment to several hours a week of work, I can only guess that TPTB at OTW (the board, et al) have already put in hours and hours during those "silent" months during which they organized--and it appears that most of this time has been spent speaking amongst themselves.

If OTW is going to be a strong, vibrant organization and not another small corner of fandom celebrating itself and legitimizing (only) itself, it's going to be because of people who aren't already buddies with the insiders who aren't afraid to ask questions.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:45 pm UTC
Pt. 1 - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:26 pm UTC
Pt. 2 - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:27 pm UTC
Re: Pt. 2 - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:27 pm UTC

[info]carmarthen
2007-09-30 09:59 pm UTC (link)
My impression is that since one of the major goals of the project is to legitimize and (hopefully) get fanfiction recognized as legal, the classing of media fanfiction as "transformative" is key. To my knowledge, RPF is pretty firmly legal (and the publishing industry seems to back me up). So yes, inclusiveness is important--but so is legal security.

And there is a ridiculously huge amount of discussion for things not to slip through the cracks occasionally. Frankly, I'm rather put off by [info]partly_bouncy's assertion that you'd have to be "pretty...isolated in fandom" not to have heard of FanHistory or her "other" fan history efforts. Er...right. THAT'S inclusive outreach that makes me want to go participate in the FanHistory wiki. OTW isn't the only fan group that needs to think about public relations and outreach.

(BTW, a clarification of what RockFic is for metafandomers might be nice--my brain keeps defaulting to The Rock, although I gather from context it's for fic about bands, not pro wrestlers.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]miriam_heddy
2007-09-30 10:32 pm UTC (link)
I've been thinking about that question since I answered your quiz, and I think that, for all that I think it's unreasonable to assume that even a long-term fan would've necessarily heard of those organizations (FanHistory, et al), I don't think it's unreasonable to argue that the OTW board should be (and can be) held to an entirely different standard than "any given fan."

One of the very first things a good organization/business does is check out the competition and do market research--finding out if there are other companies out there with overlapping services, in part because the new company (profit or non-profit) will have to justify itself as necessary and different, so it can argue for its own superiority or define its own niche.

Unlike many fans, who can spend decades in a single corner of fandom, the OTW board is made up of aca-fen who make it their business/hobby to study fandom and write about it for publication (and even money/academic cred.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-09-30 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]daegaer, 2007-10-01 12:16 pm UTC

[info]xtricks
2007-09-30 10:33 pm UTC (link)
I guess my main concern was the very first statement on the placeholder page for OTW

1.We value media fandom with its rich history and unique identity as a predominantly female culture.

Which makes number four seem less than honest.

4. We value our infinite diversity in infinite combinations.

This statement is quite true (as fandom is currently defined) but it is also true that fandom is predominantly white and middle-class but they felt no need to point that out in their mission statement. In fact, I know more men in fandom than I do people of color (this is personal information, based on what people have/have not told me, your milage may vary), yet I doubt anyone would be comfortable with adding 'white' or 'middle-class' to the above statement.

As a man who's been involved in fandom (and slash) for over eight years; comics and TV based mostly, I've grown disillusioned with fandom as a 'welcoming community'. I haven't found it to be terribly welcoming. I'm certainly aware of the history of fandom (media based anyway), and the current understanding that fandom allows women to reclaim a generally misogynistic media for themselves however, I'm not thrilled at the sense I get that 'turning the tables' is the de facto response to our currently crappy cultural bias regarding women. I write fanfic for similar reasons, we live in a homophobic society and the stories I want to see ... well, I have to write them myself.

So, in their very first 'professional' statement they've re-enforced a troubling bias in fandom that creates a climate which discourages men from participating. I know it's a small point for many people, as most fans are women, but It's a big point for me.

I was very excited at OTW when I watched it develop in comments on astrolat's and other's journals. I have to say I'm much less excited now.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 10:52 pm UTC (link)
So, in their very first 'professional' statement they've re-enforced a troubling bias in fandom that creates a climate which discourages men from participating. I know it's a small point for many people, as most fans are women, but It's a big point for me.

Interesting point! I admit I didn't look too closely at the page, so I'm glad you brought that up.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]slashpine, 2007-10-01 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xtricks, 2007-10-01 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]screwthedaisies, 2007-10-01 12:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-10-01 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-01 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-01 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xtricks, 2007-10-02 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2007-10-04 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lennoxmacbeth, 2007-10-04 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lennoxmacbeth, 2007-10-04 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2007-10-04 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-04 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2007-10-05 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alixtii, 2007-10-05 04:57 am UTC

[info]stonefinder
2007-09-30 11:41 pm UTC (link)
I don't quite get what this is. It could be that I'm just feeling too pissy to comprehend.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-09-30 11:44 pm UTC (link)
Uh, yeah, this isn't really a good intro to the issue.

Check out the [info]otw_news comm if you want the background.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]stonefinder, 2007-09-30 11:53 pm UTC

[info]dr_jekyl
2007-10-01 07:40 am UTC (link)
Not on the OTW or anything (though I may volunteer), but regarding that list of allowable content...

There are some fairly hairy international legal issues that have to be considered before they can give us a list of what can and can not be accepted. This, to the best of my knowledge, has mainly to do with chan, which skirts obscenity laws in the US and other countries, and is actually outright illegal and deemed child porn in places like Australia where I live. The idea is to support all of fandom, but you can't really say you're doing that if people are risking jail time and life long sex offender listing just by browsing the site. You also can't say you're supporting all of fandom if you exclude chan (much as I'd personally like them to). As I said, hairy issue.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-10-01 04:59 pm UTC (link)
Oh yeah, I get that. And I should go add to that comment I don't exect a definitive list, or something they're going to be held to even a couple weeks from now, but I think not having even the vaguest set of "cool/debatable/not cool" opens them up to, when the search for volunteers broadens, people saying "Well, I write exclusively chan and you won't say whether you allow it or not, so why should I participate if I don't know I can even use your archive when it's done?"

Because as much as I see the potential for OTW (not necessarily the archive, but the organization as a whole), I know (and I've experienced this pimping FanworksFinder in a couple places) there are a fair number of people who don't want to contribute if they don't see a tangible benefit for themselves.

All I really want? Is something like "Okay, right at this minute we can say with almost absolute certainty Fluffy McSchmoop fic is allowed, Photomanips of actual children having sex with DanRad's hed pastede on yay are definitely NOT allowed, chan is under debate". You know? Just even a vague sense of what, at this time, is where on the acceptable meter.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]xtricks, 2007-10-01 06:12 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-10-01 05:52 pm UTC (link)
Is "turning the tables" what fen mainly do?

I think what I meant here was more the assumption that certain genders ‘do this’ and other genders do not – the same argument that has been heard historically to discourage women from everything from military service to science to conducting classical orchestra. Fandom archives are certainly much less important than these things however I believe that human endeavors, human creativity, and the desire to engage with our culture is … human, not gender spesific.

Re: you second and third paragraph. I see a whole range of stories by women (and men), from the types you describe to ones that thoughtfully address issues, or romp through a particular canon joyfully. I guess what I see is that the traits you describe as male self-gratification are not, in fact, as male as we might assume – if significant numbers of non-male people are writing/vidding/reading/enjoying the same thing.

Men, trans, etc., need to be welcomed, not just included (as some clearly, already, are). Without that being spelled out, they, and the thinking fan, the sensitive one, or the once-bit twice-shy one, may well hold back

This is the thing for me. I’ve never had anyone come right out and say … ‘you can’t join this group/post your stories etc’ anywhere but it does create a negative climate when the consistent assumption is that I don’t even exist – a problem shared, and probably worse, for people of color in fandom.

It would be nice to see outreach endeavors begin at the ‘ground floor’ so to speak, rather than addressed as an add-on, but it may be too early for outreach to minority groups. It’s a lot of work and it may not be the right time in fandom for that sort of work – fandom is just beginning, IMO, to rise ‘above the radar’ (to many people’s concern) and that will be a rough transition.

So: POINT. Which I'll ask if I can work with s/o to fix, as opposed to just crabbing here :D If I do, can I talk to you about it?

Sure, I’m always happy to blather on about my opinionated opinions to anyone who cares to listen. The recent blog against racism (there are several links in meta-fandom), is also a good place to try and find folks who are people of color to talk about ‘who fandom is’ as well.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]xtricks
2007-10-01 05:55 pm UTC (link)
D'oh - that would be me, up there.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-01 06:17 pm UTC

[info]xtricks
2007-10-01 06:28 pm UTC (link)
Some of it, I think, is terminology issues - I don't understand the fandom terminology used in your fandom myself - and terminology is easily fixed.

The rest ... well, basically the general tenor of fandom culture right now is predominatnly female and assumes that only women are interested/doing this sort of stuff. I suspect that the gender balance will change, over the next ten years, just as role-playing games were originally almost 100% male and a 'guy thing' but that has changed a lot in the 20 years I've been a gamer.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]partly_bouncy
2007-10-01 07:10 pm UTC (link)
About a year and a half ago, I wrote this about men in fandom and it needs a lot of work... but I think that the male participation level is there. I just don't think they are necessarily as involved in parts of the LiveJournal based fandom as they are elsewhere. Because of that, I think there is a lack of awareness regarding what contributions that men make in fandom, as fans.

Xing Li, fan, founded FanFiction.Net. He is arguably one of the single most influential people in all of fandom even if his role is largely invisible. Steven Savage has been hugely influential. I can think of at least four guys who are archivist. The Anime fandom historically seems to have had greater male participation, both in terms of creating fan fiction fanzines, in running conventions, in running fan fiction archives, in moderating Usenet groups.

It feels like there is a vested interest on the part of some subgroups in fandom to define fan spaces involving fan fiction as female fan space. I would characterize them as a vocal minority as most fans, especially when you go to places where other fan types dominate, don't seem to spend much time analyzing this. I think they also have a vested interest in defining the demographics in their terms because it helps their argument. And they do their demographic work in places that tend to reflect on their own needs. (I've chatted with RockFic, FanWorks.Org, MediaMiner.Org and a few other archives. None of them have been approached with a request to have academics post surveys on their site. I've poked around MySpace, Quizilla, FaceBook. I haven't seen fan fiction scholars doing those requests there. I have SEVERE problems with some of the methodology they are using. Can you tell?) According to FanFiction.Net, "e Media Metrix the site's user base is 61% female (75% according to internal surveys)" which puts male representation at much higher levels than they discuss.

I think the tenor is different than they one that they're talking about but I occupy different fan space and have different interests than they do. Our own experiences shape how we perceive things.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-01 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-10-01 07:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-01 07:55 pm UTC
The role of men in fandom... (Or being wildly off topic) - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-10-01 08:01 pm UTC
Xena - [info]partly_bouncy, 2007-10-01 07:51 pm UTC
Re: Xena - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-01 07:57 pm UTC

[info]elfwreck
2007-10-01 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Thank you for this.

I saw the beginnings of this, in the wank wake of Fanlib going live, and was all in favor of it. (I'm still all in favor of the idea, and believe it's too early to think about whether it's "working" or not.)

I've seen the beginnings of a lot of non-fannish organizations intending to be cross-group, and most of them collapse under the weight of practical issues and trying to allow too many personalities controlling influence. I think it'd be worse, at this point, to be open and transparent and available to everyone... it's easier to inflict a finished (or at least workable) site on people and say, "now we're opening for members, including board members," than to take all comers and then vote on what the site layout will be.

I like the idea of the archive. I'm not sure about the name, but then, I'm not sure about any of the names I saw suggested. I like and respect the people who've taken charge of it; I trust them to make good decisions, and I know they want to be very inclusive, even if they start with LJ fandom 'cos that's what they know best.

But I'm very glad someone's watching out for the potential problems.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-10-01 10:08 pm UTC (link)
I'm still all in favor of the idea, and believe it's too early to think about whether it's "working" or not.

I think, at this point, I'm leaning far more towards "in favor" - the fact that this discussion, that raising these criticisms and questions has by and large been a positive experience (if a bit overwhelming) has tilted my opinion more towards the "yay!" side.

Because it makes me feel better that it's been met with "okay here's our reason" and "well, you think that but I think this and here's why" rather than "IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT DON'T PARTICIPATE" and "DON'T CRITICIZE UNTIL YOU VOLUNTEER"...it's discourse, not wank.

And it is too early to tell, definitely. Which is part of the fun, really - I like watching all this unfold and having NO IDEA where it's going.

I think it'd be worse, at this point, to be open and transparent and available to everyone... it's easier to inflict a finished (or at least workable) site on people and say, "now we're opening for members, including board members," than to take all comers and then vote on what the site layout will be.

Good point, and one I've not considered much.

I think there's a danger of, if it happens that way, it looking like "We're here! The mighty LJ fen, bearing a shiny new archive you'll love to use!"

But. The way you described - getting it functional and then opening up EVERYTHING to fen from all corners...I can definitely see that working.

But I'm very glad someone's watching out for the potential problems.

And I'm very glad it looks like the majority of people got that I'm saying "okay, squee and enthusiasm are good...but not EVERYTHING'S perfect right now" rather than thinking I'm saying "Yeah, failure's imminent, y'all suck."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tiferet
2007-10-02 12:57 am UTC (link)
Actually, I happen to think there is a very great need for an unbiased fannish history wiki that doesn't ban people Michela and Fandom Wank don't like and doesn't exist primarily to immortalise grudges--she posted on one of the very first SPN comms asking for our wank, not our history, to put in that wiki.

(Reply to this)

Fanhistory's list of archives
[info]elfwreck
2007-10-02 05:25 am UTC (link)
Doesn't include Squidge.org and has only a single Lord of the Rings archive, dated 1999, without even a URL. (It seems to prefer not to post the URLs to the actual archive sites, which seems odd for a wiki.)

I consider these substantial gaps. (It's also missing several Harry Potter archives, but any list that wasn't eighteen pages long would be missing several Harry Potter archives.) It lists three Star Trek fic sites, two of which are Voyager-specific. Considering the importance of Trek fic in the history of fanfic, I consider this more than a substantial gap. Missing a number of other/smaller fandoms--Highlander, Supernatural (which may be too new to have archives), DC comics, Pirates of the Caribbean.

It doesn't seem to think that LiveJournal communities count as fic archives. (I can understand not wanting to list every fic comm on LJ... but there's no reason they aren't just as much archives as any other place where you sign up to post fic.)

None of this is awful, but it does show biases. It's a good resource, but it's substantially incomplete, in ways that make it look more like "one person/small group of friends' link collection" than a systematic attempt to include some sites while excluding others. (For example, only listing still-active archives, or archives over a certain number of stories, or archives with open membership.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Fanhistory's list of archives
[info]slashpine
2007-10-02 08:41 am UTC (link)
Squidge.org - YES! I went over there when Hector first posted on this (actually, on fanthropology) and looked to see if it had gotten better than I recalled. The X-Files entry seems very piecey and the omission of Squidge -- while a lot of far more trivial dates are included -- really struck me, too! DITB is a rather essential gateway to internet X-Philia. One significant crossover writer was also missing, who led a number of X-files fans to HP: Josan (josanpq).

Man from Uncle has only an intro; and there is tons available, thanks to st_crispins (an aca fan! Oh WOEZ. Who happens to have been a leading fan and fan fic writer for decades, so stuff that in the pipe of jealousy :-)
Other classic spy-slash is absent.

Georgette Heyer hasn't even a stub.

So yeah, just a cursory look suggests you're right, it's a "one person/small group of friends' link collection" at least at this point. Don't know where FH wants to go.

Hey, maybe they should be doing some outreach! I've certainly never seen anything about them in most of my fandoms; just here and on fanthropology, and some of partly_bouncy's (the owner??) metafandom-linked posts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-02 11:35 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]slashpine, 2007-10-03 12:50 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]hector_rashbaum, 2007-10-03 02:06 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]slashpine, 2007-10-03 03:36 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]sidewinder, 2007-10-02 11:42 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]elfwreck, 2007-10-02 06:47 pm UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]randomsome1, 2007-10-05 03:01 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]elfwreck, 2007-10-05 07:08 am UTC
Re: Fanhistory's list of archives - [info]spare_change, 2007-10-05 05:40 pm UTC

(109 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…