ten thousand kinds of suck fucking wrong ([info]hector_rashbaum) wrote,
@ 2007-09-29 20:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:bitching, brainz om nom nom nom, otw

Organization for Transformative Wank
I was hesitant about the Archive of Our Own stuff from the beginning. Aside from the fact that I really don't see a need for another archive for myself to use - I have RockFic, and [info]hectorfic, and those are plenty good enough for me - it seemed right from the get-go like a bloated, overambitious, doomed-to-fail vanity project.

My opinion mellowed a bit over time. Yes, it was still bloated, and the ambition wasn't quite in line with the abilities of those interested, and I still doubt it'll get where it's supposed to go. But I was less "oh God this is gonna suck"and more "okay this should be interesting to watch".

For a long time, the [info]otw_news comm was silent. Or, mostly silent: From June 14th to August 4th inclusive, there were 3 updates, one of which was simply to say there was no news.

September 21, activity. A post to inform the name had been changed (more on that in a second), there was a Community Relations committee, and more news was coming.

The name was changed to the Organization for Transformative Works (OTW), the community to [info]otw_news. The name didn't sit right with me, but I wasn't sure why - it seemed pompous and overblown, but there was more. I'll get back to it.

As promised, more news came September 28th. Lots of news! Boards had been formed, projects were in the works, domain name had been purchased and a placeholder page put up.

To be honest, up until now I haven't followed OTW all that closely. They're on my friends list, on the "Daily Read" filter, but generally I'd read the update and ten or so "yay so cool!" comments and forget about it.

But [info]partly_bouncy pointed something interesting out in her LJ - one of the proposed eventual projects was a fan history wiki.

Um. Whut.

She posted to point out a fan history wiki already exists. As did I.

The initial answer to my "why?" was "bringing another voice into the preservation of fannish history". To which I responded that as a wiki, it is by nature not just one voice, and any voice that wants to can participate. I recieved, in essende, corporate bullshit as an answer to that.

I won't go through the whole thread; you should read it. The other important point from there is the original poster, [info]femmequixotic stepped in and asked that I e-mail her to discuss outreach beyond LJ.

Before I get into my discussion with [info]femmequixotic and what that brought to light, I want to call attention to a couple other threads:

[info]anextropian asks about the lack of outreach

Anonymous points out there were derogatory statements made about non-LJ fen by OTW supporters

Those were all posted before I contacted [info]femmequixotic. I'll spare you the long-winded e-mail, but in essence I told her:
- I don't know much about fandom outside RockFic (RF) and a bit of LJ so I'm not much help in the outreach department
- [info]partly_bouncy knows her shit, and the FanHistory.com list of archives is an excellent resource
- [info]screwthedaisies TRIED to get in touch with OTW quite a while ago and was ignored
- My main suggestion is to get to outreach NOW and be willing to retool some of the boards to reflect more than just LJ fandom

In her e-mail back to me - in which she once again admitted and apologized for the failure to look off LJ for interest before now - she essentially said my suggestions were good, she'd try to get in touch with [info]screwthedaisies and [info]partly_bouncy, and that she didn't know anything about RockFic or FanworksFinder (FwF), so could I tell her something about them?

That should have been a big red flag right there, and I'll explain why in a moment. But it didn't ping me, so I explained about RockFic (for those who don't know: RockFic.com's a bandfic archive, paid membership [48-hour free trial], 18+, quality controlled, aimed more at classic rock/metal/hard rock than "emo"/FBR bands), pimped FwF (which y'all should be using ;] ), all good. Another e-mail from her, expressing her surprise at having never come across either, being a bandslasher.

Again, should've red-flagged me. But I didn't think anything of it, I'd found a different issue.

Remember me saying the Organization for Transformative Works name bothered me? [info]partly_bouncy touched on why in IM - RPF? Isn't transformative. I suppose a case could be made that it is, in fact, transformative, but it'd take a lot to persuade me. And fact aside, historically "transformative" hasn't applied to RPF.

I brought that up here and got told [info]femmequixotic would get me a more concrete answer from someone involved in the renaming. Fair 'nuff.

(ETA: [info]femmequixotic has answered the name question, with much the same answer as the first time - they consider RPF transformative. Fair enough - although I'm still curious as to how they'll address the historical issue of RPF not being "transformative" when reaching out to RPF communities.

ETA again: Further downthread, she points out the archive is still "An Archive of Our Own", which...does make more sense than referring to the archive as an organization. Heh.)

And, because I never run out of questions, I also asked when the community could expect, if not a rough TOU/TOS, at the very least a list of what content will be acceptable and unacceptable, and what content hasn't been decided on yet. No answer yet.

Alright. So. Why should the fact that [info]femmequixotic hadn't ever heard of RockFic bother me?

In [info]partlybouncy's LJ, we've been discussing OTW. And we brought up [info]femmequixotic as a bandslasher, and [info]sidewinder pointed out (in an flocked post in [info]partly_bouncy's LJ) she sounded more like a media fan that had come into bandfic through the MCR/Panic!/FOB fandom. Nothing wrong with that, and it may explain the lack of RF knowledge - RF doesn't really cater to that fandom so much.

But. As I was typing up that in response to [info]sidewinder, something occurred to me (that was also pointed out in that flocked post) - anyone who works for OTW should have at least some knowledge of RockFic.

It's on the list of archives to be looked into. In fact, [info]sidewinder even commented about RF's 48-hour free trial for anyone who wanted to take a look.

([info]sidewinder, if you've got links to any other times you mentioned RF on/to OTW, I'll add 'em in)

(ETA: [info]sidewinder has commented to this entry with a summary of her own mentions of RockFic throughout the OTW discussions)

So, folks, the members of OTW's board are, apparently, ignoring user input. By her own admittance [info]femmequixotic should have an interest in RockFic even outside of the OTW work, and she apparently had no idea it existed! Even though it'd been mentioned by users and included in an offical OTW post.

I'd like the issue with the name addressed satisfactorily. I'd like that list of allowable content. I'd like to see concrete outreach happening. And I'd kind of like to know what all the research and discussion from months ago were for, if not to be actually used and applied.

I don't, at present, actively support OTW; nor would I consider myself a detractor. I see lots of questions that need raising - and I think I'll continue to raise them until I decide one way or the other. So we'll see.

ETA: One more issue I'd like to bring up:

Questions have been raised, here and here, about finances - specifically concerning the rename token, but with the underlying questions of "why don't we know anything about this project's finances?"

A satisfactory response hasn't really come yet. And that's one of my big concerns with this multitude of committees - a simple question (who paid?) with an important undertone (what's going on with this organization's finances?) can't get a straight answer, just "I'll have finance look into it" followed by "financial reports are coming eventually". I would imagine that, considering one of the big issues with LJ is its refusal to clearly communicate its expectations and restrictions, clear communication would be important to OTW staff.

Son of ETA: I'd also like to state this is in no way meant to be an attack on [info]femmequixotic, simply an expression of concern that the chairperson of Community Relations appears to have completely missed some discussion, and a question of how much else is slipping by unnoticed, and why, exactly, are we contributing only to be ignored?




(Read 109 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]spare_change
2007-10-01 09:38 pm UTC (link)
Hello there! (Really agreed with your comments over at [info]metamiri's LJ, btw.)

You're right, but of course this is still up in the air because they haven't made their policies clear on stuff like chan yet. Also, I think it's really important for authors to be able to delete their work if they wish, and from some of the comments on that OTW post, that definitely hasn't been decided either. I get nervous when the importance of preserving "history" gets placed over the needs of individuals, and they just haven't been at all clear yet where their priorities lie.

But above all that, I just don't dig the archive. I'm not a mediafan and I don't share their values or concerns and I don't endorse their legal policy or they're claiming to be the public voice of fandom.

It's an archive started by mediafen BNFs for their community. That's fine. I just think that the current kerfuffle is a perfect example of why they shouldn't be claiming to be more than they are -- the best way to address these claims of exclusion is for them to simply make it clear where their own limitations lie.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2007-10-01 09:53 pm UTC (link)
It's an archive started by mediafen BNFs for their community. That's fine. I just think that the current kerfuffle is a perfect example of why they shouldn't be claiming to be more than they are -- the best way to address these claims of exclusion is for them to simply make it clear where their own limitations lie.

Yes, exactly.


As for using it myself, it pretty much depends on how easy it is to upload and whether there seems to be any great benefit from it. If it's all LJ fans, are they going to be mostly reading from LJ first and just using this as backup? If so, will I really be getting much extra exposure by posting there or is it a waste of time? Like, I'm pretty gung-ho about posting to FFN when I can, because it's a totally different audience (and despite the way people diss it, I have not found any difference in the quality of feedback I receive there vs LJ).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]spare_change
2007-10-01 10:12 pm UTC (link)
YAY FOR FF.NET LOVE!

I couldn't agree with you more: I think there are both quality stories and quality feedback to be found there for those who are willing to look. Almost everything I read is from ff.net: in fact, the genre I read almost exclusively nowadays (Snape-Harry mentor gen fics) has hardly any LJ representation at all.

Anyway, your mentioning of ff.net also brings me to the elephant in the corner of the room: Does OTW really want ff.net writers/readers? Does it really care about all of these other fans in parts of fandom that OTW knows so little about? Despite their protestations, I really don't think so. I think that there's a lot of contempt for these folks, actually: whether that be dismissing the majority of fandom as n00bs and feral fans, insisting that they aren't really part of fandom (which is then defined in very narrow and exclusive terms), etc. And I think that's probably why I have such a bad taste in my mouth about the whole thing.

My half-assed theory is that the folks who are invested in thinking of their fannish production as intellectual, transgressive, etc., aren't really all that eager to affiliate themselves with the sugar-crazed 12 year olds writing self-insertion Blues Clues fic. Because that threatens their own identity.

But of course I really don't know. Personally, I don't need the approval or official imprimature of acafen to make me feel good or validated about what I'm doing. And I'm not invested in the history of mediafen as somehow more authentic or central than any other fannish history.

So bring on ff.net, I say! (And I will be very surprised if OTW finds a way to resolve the legal issues that required the restrictions found at other archives.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2007-10-01 10:29 pm UTC (link)
I don't tend to read much on FFN because I haven't the patience for searching through archives and tend to work from recs instead. But that goes for any archive and LJ comms as well.

I have already seen people suggest that this new archive should be 18+ or should only accept quality fic, both of which are problematic (writing badfic is certainly not limited to under-18s!! and who defines quality?). I mean, I don't want to slog through a bunch of badfic to find the gems, either, but IMO taking kids out of the equation does not improve your chances in that regard. LJ is filled with excrebly bad fanfic written by women older than me.

As for the legal issues, I think a lot of that will depend on how big it really gets. FFN is huge and has a giant target painted on its back, but I'm not sure I see this as ever getting that big...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

you're making it too easy!
[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-10-01 10:55 pm UTC (link)
captive audience* AND you gave me a perfect lead-in. Beautiful.

If you like working from recs, you should check out FanworksFinder if you haven't already.

You can find/rec/review fics/art/vids/meta from all over the internet. And you can see who else recced any fic/art/vid/meta you liked, and through their profile see what else they recced; or, at the bottom of every listing, there's a list of what people who recced that fic/art/vid/meta also liked

*plug plug plug*

*or as captive an audience as you can be, on the internet, lol

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: you're making it too easy!
[info]kyuuketsukirui
2007-10-01 11:05 pm UTC (link)
LOL! I have looked at it, but while I think it's a really neat idea, I found it just as frustrating as looking through an archive because at least with the fandoms I was looking at, most fics only had one rec each and no commentary, and there weren't many fics I recognised so I couldn't do the "well, they liked this one that I liked, so let's see what else they liked" sort of thing. I'll be keeping an eye on it, and hopefully some of those issues will resolve the more people start using it, but right now, I lasted about five minutes before I got frustrated.

Really, I like being able to just have recs appear on my LJ flist or delicious network and not have to do any work at all. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: you're making it too easy!
[info]hector_rashbaum
2007-10-01 11:08 pm UTC (link)
A lot of the problems with it are problems that'll go away with time - as it develops a bigger user base, more fandoms will be better represented and it'll get more useful.

(and yes, doing no work is nice...*runs off to not do any work*)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: you're making it too easy!
[info]kyuuketsukirui
2007-10-01 11:12 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, exactly. I must have looked through ten pages of SGA fics and only seen two titles I recognised (which I then left reviews for), so whoever's adding SGA fics is obviously moving in different circles than I am.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: you're making it too easy!
[info]partly_bouncy
2007-10-01 11:31 pm UTC (link)
The trick is to get other people in there. You'll notice a lot of CSI recs, going on at least 15 pages. I put a bunch of links for stories I loved into a spread sheet, submitted to [info]screwthedaisies, wrote reviews for some of those stories, recced a bunch more, cross posted my reviews on the site with links to the review on an active fan fiction message board in my fandom, cross posted them to LiveJournal. Not all of the reviews were positive and some of the authors were in the vicinity.

And then they came to see. A lot of them didn't like it but it got at least four or five others there reccing and reviewing stories. And yeah! for that. It means that some of the reviews, at least for my pairing in my fandom, are actually pretty good.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read 109 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…